![]() ![]() States) and occur when one or more States have recourse to. – Provides more robust protections in NIAC to include regulation of means and methods – Effectively neutered by its implementing arrangement (requiring territorial control etc. Armed conflicts in the sense of Article 2(1) are those which oppose High Contracting Parties (i.e. It is a fact of life that armed conflictthe resort to organized force between States or within States is, and always has been, an integral part of the human condition. Common Article 3 applies to armed conflicts not of an international character occurring in the territory of one of the High Contracting Parties. May be followed de facto) – Humane treatment baseline seen as the minimum floor of protections applicable in all CH 27: THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT (INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW) 2. IHL treaty law establishes a distinction between NIACs within the meaning of common Article 3 and NIACs falling within the definition provided in Article 1 of Additional Protocol II. Humanity in armed conflict– CA 3 seldom acknowledged by states as applicable de jure due to legitimacy concerns (but ![]() ![]() Common Article 3– “Convention in miniature” for NIAC represented a significant step forward for protecting Part II examines the gap between the respective meanings of the two concepts and the potential legal consequences. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |